اکثر مکاتبات کومش از طریق ایمیل سایت می باشد. لطفا Spam ایمیل خود را نیز چک نمایید.
   [Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
Subscription::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Webmail::
Editorial Board::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 3, Issue 3 (5-1381) ::
Koomesh 1381, 3(3): 123-129 Back to browse issues page
Evaluating two indirect hemagglutination methods in diagnosis of listeriosis in comparison with indirect immunoflourecens
B. صدیقی مقدم
Abstract:   (14854 Views)
Introduction: Ba ct e rimi a res u lte d fro m Lis t eri a mono cyt ogen e s lea ds to va rIOUS complications including abortion . While cult uring the specimen is a crocial me thod in diagn osing of liste ri osi s, it has low se ns it ivity (because o f the few number of bacteria in specimens) and takes long time. Serological methods are used routinely in many diagnostic laboratories because of improved time and sensitivity. Materials and methods: IHA (indirect hemagglutination) was performed using fract ion 1, obtai ne d from ge l chroma tograp hy of sonica te d liste r ia monocytoge ne s cr ude antige ns. IHA th rou gh pot e l's me th od was ca rried on. Se ns it ivity and specific ity of th ese methods compa re d with current IFA (immunotlourecens assay) in diagnos ing the Listeriosis. The titers of antibody against Listeri a mon ocytoge nes were de te rmine d in se rums of 207 women having at le ast o ne abortion. Among this group serums of 96 women by IHA with soluble antigens in fra ction I and 82 women by IHA with soluble antigen in potel's method were tes ted . Results: In IFA (sensitivity 70% and spec ificity 50%),83.5% had valuable titer s of antibody. Niether crude antige n n or t hr ee fr ac tio ns we re suitab le for IHA, bu t al182 serums (pote l's method) showing 1/4 to 1/256 tite rs (se nsit ivity 36% and spec ificity 96%) . Conclusion: IFA is the most cu rrent method b ut, because o f h igh sensit ivity a nd low specific ity a more confident meth od is required. This study shows antigenic fraction s of listeria monocytoge nes are no t suitab le for IHA, while cha ng ing the co nd itio n of cu ltu re in po tel's method leads to the applicable antigen for IHA. Lack of correlation betwee n IFA and potel's IHA indicate that the nature of antigens arc diffe rent in bot h me thods. Thus it is recommended to use IFA for screening and simultaneously potel's IHA (because of high specificity).
Keywords: Indirect immunotlourecens (IFA), Indirect hemagglutinati on (IHA), Liste riosis
Full-Text [PDF 2490 kb]   (2703 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2008/12/23 | Published: 2002/08/15
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

صدیقی مقدم B. Evaluating two indirect hemagglutination methods in diagnosis of listeriosis in comparison with indirect immunoflourecens. Koomesh 1381; 3 (3) :123-129
URL: http://koomeshjournal.semums.ac.ir/article-1-280-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 3, Issue 3 (5-1381) Back to browse issues page
کومش Koomesh
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 38 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645