1. [1] Van Raan AF. The use of bibliometric analysis in research performance assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific development. Technol Assessment Theory Pract 2003; 12: 20-29.

2. [2] Erfanmanesh M, Nojavan F. Qualitative and quantitative status and international visibility of Iranian journals indexed in journal citation reports. Iran J Inf Process Manag 2016; 32: 51-73.

3. [3] Rashidi A, Mohtashami A, Nazari H, Eftekhari F. investigating the rate of visibility of urmia medical journal articles in Scopus Compared with other medical Journals of northwest medical university of Iran. J Urmia Univ Med Sci 2016; 27. (Persian).

4. [4] Tang M, Liao H, Wan Z, Herrera-Viedma E, Rosen MA. Ten years of sustainability (2009 to 2018): a bibliometric overview. Sustainability 2018; 10: 1655.

5. [5] Marefat R, Saberi M, Abdolmajid A, Zoodranj M. A survey on collaboration rate of authors in presenting scientific papers in Koomesh journal during 1999-2010. Koomesh 2012; 13: 279-286. (Persian).

6. [6] Kalita D. The scientometrics of nature. J Sci Res 2016; 5: 123-134.

7. [7] Zhang CC, Zheng X, Su CH, Huang H, Yan FR, Pan XJ, et al. A bibliometric study of the Journal of School Health: 1965-2014. Chin Nurs Res 2017; 4: 75-83.

8. [8] Ansari M, Karimi M, Fallah M, Lotfi S, Valinejadi A. Scientific cooperation networks of Semnan university of medical sciences in the web of science database between 2013-2017. Koomesh 2019; 21: 1-10. (Persian).

9. [9] Saberi MK. Open Access Journals with a view of journals covered in ISI. Inform Sci Technol 2009; 24: 105-122.

10. [10] Mohseni M. Investigating the external and internal problems of scientific journals in Iran. J Acad Librari Inform Res 2002; 36: 41-71.

11. [11] Mirhaghjoo-Langroodi S. Evaluation Scintometric of Quran Studies Magazine. Quran Studi Quarterly 2013; 4: 141-155.

12. [12] Hart RL. Collaborative publication by University librarians: An exploratory study. J Acad Librari 2000; 26: 94-99.

13. [13] Low WY, Ng KH, Kabir MA, Koh AP, Sinnasamy J. Trend and impact of international collaboration in clinical medicine papers published in Malaysia. Scientometrics 2014; 98: 1521-1533.

14. [14] Stvilia B, Hinnant CC, Schindler K, Worrall A, Burnett G, Burnett K, et al. Composition of scientific teams and publication productivity at a national science lab. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 2011; 62: 270-283.

15. [15] Abramo G, D'Angelo CA. The relationship between the number of authors of a publication, its citations and the impact factor of the publishing journal: Evidence from Italy. J Informetrics 2015; 9: 746-761.

16. [16] Huang MH, Wu LL, Wu YC. A study of research collaboration in the pre-web and post-web stages: A coauthorship analysis of the information systems discipline. J Assoc Inform Sci Technol 2015; 66: 778-797.

17. [17] Mokhnacheva YV. The influence of various forms of co-authorship on the scientific productivity of Russian scientists in the field of molecular biology. Sci Technic Inform Proces 2015; 42: 162-172.

18. [1] Van Raan AF. The use of bibliometric analysis in research performance assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific development. Technol Assessment Theory Pract 2003; 12: 20-29.

19. [2] Erfanmanesh M, Nojavan F. Qualitative and quantitative status and international visibility of Iranian journals indexed in journal citation reports. Iran J Inf Process Manag 2016; 32: 51-73.

20. [3] Rashidi A, Mohtashami A, Nazari H, Eftekhari F. investigating the rate of visibility of urmia medical journal articles in Scopus Compared with other medical Journals of northwest medical university of Iran. J Urmia Univ Med Sci 2016; 27. (Persian).

21. [4] Tang M, Liao H, Wan Z, Herrera-Viedma E, Rosen MA. Ten years of sustainability (2009 to 2018): a bibliometric overview. Sustainability 2018; 10: 1655.

22. [5] Marefat R, Saberi M, Abdolmajid A, Zoodranj M. A survey on collaboration rate of authors in presenting scientific papers in Koomesh journal during 1999-2010. Koomesh 2012; 13: 279-286. (Persian).

23. [6] Kalita D. The scientometrics of nature. J Sci Res 2016; 5: 123-134.

24. [7] Zhang CC, Zheng X, Su CH, Huang H, Yan FR, Pan XJ, et al. A bibliometric study of the Journal of School Health: 1965-2014. Chin Nurs Res 2017; 4: 75-83.

25. [8] Ansari M, Karimi M, Fallah M, Lotfi S, Valinejadi A. Scientific cooperation networks of Semnan university of medical sciences in the web of science database between 2013-2017. Koomesh 2019; 21: 1-10. (Persian).

26. [9] Saberi MK. Open Access Journals with a view of journals covered in ISI. Inform Sci Technol 2009; 24: 105-122.

27. [10] Mohseni M. Investigating the external and internal problems of scientific journals in Iran. J Acad Librari Inform Res 2002; 36: 41-71.

28. [11] Mirhaghjoo-Langroodi S. Evaluation Scintometric of Quran Studies Magazine. Quran Studi Quarterly 2013; 4: 141-155.

29. [12] Hart RL. Collaborative publication by University librarians: An exploratory study. J Acad Librari 2000; 26: 94-99.

30. [13] Low WY, Ng KH, Kabir MA, Koh AP, Sinnasamy J. Trend and impact of international collaboration in clinical medicine papers published in Malaysia. Scientometrics 2014; 98: 1521-1533.

31. [14] Stvilia B, Hinnant CC, Schindler K, Worrall A, Burnett G, Burnett K, et al. Composition of scientific teams and publication productivity at a national science lab. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 2011; 62: 270-283.

32. [15] Abramo G, D'Angelo CA. The relationship between the number of authors of a publication, its citations and the impact factor of the publishing journal: Evidence from Italy. J Informetrics 2015; 9: 746-761.

33. [16] Huang MH, Wu LL, Wu YC. A study of research collaboration in the pre-web and post-web stages: A coauthorship analysis of the information systems discipline. J Assoc Inform Sci Technol 2015; 66: 778-797.

34. [17] Mokhnacheva YV. The influence of various forms of co-authorship on the scientific productivity of Russian scientists in the field of molecular biology. Sci Technic Inform Proces 2015; 42: 162-172.