اکثر مکاتبات کومش از طریق ایمیل سایت می باشد. لطفا Spam ایمیل خود را نیز چک نمایید.
   [Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
Subscription::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Webmail::
Editorial Board::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 13, Issue 1 ( (پياپی 41)، پائيز 1390) ::
Koomesh 1390, 13(1): 83-92 Back to browse issues page
Comparing the effects of iontophoresis and phonophoresis of dexamethasone on the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome
Amir Hoshang بختیاری , Elham فاطمی , Mitra امامی , Mojtaba ملک
Abstract:   (15805 Views)
  Introduction: Using anti-inflammatory medicine injection such as dexamethasone acetate (DXA) is a common treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Iontophoresis and phonophoresis of DXA are two other ways which may help to introduce DXA locally to inflammated tissues. This study has been deigned to compare the effect of iontophoresis and phonophoresis of DXA on the CTS treatment.   Materials and Methods : 35 mild or moderate CTS patients (51 affected hands) were randomly assigned in one of the two experimental: iontophoresis (25 affected hands) and phonophoresis (26 affected hands) groups. Subjects in iontophoresis group received 10 sessions of iontophoresis of %0.4 DXA solution (DC, 0.2 mA/cm2, 20 min) over the wrist of the affected hands while the other group received 10 sessions of phonophoresis of %0.4 DXA jell with pulsed ultrasound (1 MHz, 1 W.cm-2, 5 min). The strength of hand and thumb grips, paresthesia, pain, motor and sensory distal latency and evoked potential of median nerve were measured before and after intervention and after 4 weeks follow-up.   Results: Comparisons of the mean changes showed more increase in hand grip (P=0.006) and thumb grip (P=0.0002), less pain perception (P=0.001), shorter sensory (P=0.0001) and motor (P=0.0008) distal latency and higher sensory and motor (P=0.0001) action potential in the phonophoresis in compared with the iontophoresis group.   Conclusion: Our results show that using phonophoresis of DXA is more effective for CTS treatment, than the iontophoresis method. More studies are needed to investigate the role of different parameters used during phonophoresis of DXA in the CTS treatment.  
Keywords: Carpal tunnel syndrome, Dexamethasone, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Iontophoresis, Phonophoresis
Full-Text [PDF 175 kb]   (3824 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2011/01/30 | Accepted: 2015/02/4 | Published: 2015/02/4
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

بختیاری A H, فاطمی E, امامی M, ملک M. Comparing the effects of iontophoresis and phonophoresis of dexamethasone on the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome . Koomesh 1390; 13 (1) :83-92
URL: http://koomeshjournal.semums.ac.ir/article-1-1190-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 13, Issue 1 ( (پياپی 41)، پائيز 1390) Back to browse issues page
کومش Koomesh
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 38 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645